Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Per capita sources of protein
Kiribati
38.01
in 2023
Zimbabwe
37.81
in 2023
Kiribati rank
155th
Zimbabwe rank
157th
Per capita sources of protein over time
- Kiribati
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 38.01 against 37.81 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.2.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Kiribati ranks 155th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23.59 | 50.01 | 26.43 | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 29.83 | 51.46 | 21.63 | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 32.85 | 44.47 | 11.62 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 32.71 | 41.16 | 8.45 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 32.9 | 39.48 | 6.58 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 38.09 | 29.85 | 8.23 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 38.74 | 35.95 | 2.79 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita sources of protein, Kiribati or Zimbabwe?
- Kiribati, at 38.01 against 37.81 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita sources of protein between Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Zimbabwe rank globally for per capita sources of protein?
- Kiribati ranks 155th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita sources of protein. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.