Jamaica vs Namibia: Per capita sources of protein
Jamaica
43.01
in 2023
Namibia
43.18
in 2023
Jamaica rank
108th
Namibia rank
105th
Per capita sources of protein over time
- Jamaica
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 43.18 against 43.01 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.
Jamaica ranks 108th and Namibia ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31.53 | 40.23 | 8.7 | Namibia |
| 1970s | 37.27 | 40.29 | 3.02 | Namibia |
| 1980s | 36.6 | 42.6 | 6 | Namibia |
| 1990s | 36.39 | 40.4 | 4.01 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 36.72 | 40.45 | 3.73 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 39.81 | 42.6 | 2.79 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 42.98 | 42.89 | 0.09 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita sources of protein, Jamaica or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 43.18 against 43.01 in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita sources of protein between Jamaica and Namibia?
- 0.17, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Namibia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Namibia rank globally for per capita sources of protein?
- Jamaica ranks 108th and Namibia ranks 105th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita sources of protein. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.