Iceland vs New Caledonia: Per capita sources of protein
Iceland
45.23
in 2023
New Caledonia
45.58
in 2023
Iceland rank
84th
New Caledonia rank
81st
Per capita sources of protein over time
- Iceland
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 45.58 against 45.23 in Iceland, a difference of 0.35.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Iceland ranks 84th and New Caledonia ranks 81st of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27.14 | 34.17 | 7.02 | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 26.17 | 33.7 | 7.53 | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 29.49 | 32.42 | 2.93 | New Caledonia |
| 1990s | 36.41 | 29.4 | 7.01 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 34.83 | 31.29 | 3.54 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 37.57 | 37.95 | 0.3775 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 44.99 | 43.95 | 1.05 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita sources of protein, Iceland or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 45.58 against 45.23 in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita sources of protein between Iceland and New Caledonia?
- 0.35, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and New Caledonia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and New Caledonia rank globally for per capita sources of protein?
- Iceland ranks 84th and New Caledonia ranks 81st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita sources of protein. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.