Argentina vs Botswana: Per capita sources of protein
Argentina
45.93
in 2023
Botswana
46.41
in 2023
Argentina rank
78th
Botswana rank
77th
Per capita sources of protein over time
- Argentina
- Botswana
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 46.41 against 45.93 in Argentina, a difference of 0.48.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.
Argentina ranks 78th and Botswana ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 38.27 | 48.07 | 9.79 | Botswana |
| 1970s | 35.7 | 51.6 | 15.9 | Botswana |
| 1980s | 34.44 | 46.14 | 11.7 | Botswana |
| 1990s | 35.05 | 43.17 | 8.12 | Botswana |
| 2000s | 35.4 | 39.09 | 3.69 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 39.63 | 45.08 | 5.45 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 45.41 | 46.73 | 1.31 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita sources of protein, Argentina or Botswana?
- Botswana, at 46.41 against 45.93 in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita sources of protein between Argentina and Botswana?
- 0.48, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Botswana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Botswana rank globally for per capita sources of protein?
- Argentina ranks 78th and Botswana ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Per capita sources of protein. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.