Armenia vs Equatorial Guinea: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, per

Armenia
5.52 people per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
5.77 people per square kilometre
in 2017
Armenia rank
66th
Equatorial Guinea rank
64th

People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, per over time

  • Armenia
  • Equatorial Guinea
02468200020112023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 5.77 people per square kilometre against 5.52 people per square kilometre in Armenia, a difference of 0.25 people per square kilometre.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 66th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 64th of 171 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 6.89 people per square kilometre 6.25 people per square kilometre 0.6427 people per square kilometre Armenia
2010s 6.18 people per square kilometre 5.56 people per square kilometre 0.6283 people per square kilometre Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, per, Armenia or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 5.77 people per square kilometre against 5.52 people per square kilometre in Armenia as of 2017.
What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, per between Armenia and Equatorial Guinea?
0.25 people per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Equatorial Guinea?
18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Armenia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, per?
Armenia ranks 66th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 64th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Equatorial Guinea: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/people-in-rural-areas-not-using-improved-sanitation-facilities-per-square-kilometre/armenia/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/people-in-rural-areas-not-using-improved-sanitation-facilities-per-square-kilometre/armenia/equatorial-guinea/">Armenia vs Equatorial Guinea: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, per square kilometre
Unit
people per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 3,991 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.