Czechia vs Oman: People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities
Czechia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2014
Oman
-100 % change on previous year
in 2015
Czechia rank
141st
Oman rank
141st
People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities over time
- Czechia
- Oman
How they compare
Czechia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Oman, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 141st and Oman ranks 141st of 163 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -9.62 % change on previous year | -8.48 % change on previous year | 1.13 % change on previous year | Oman |
| 2010s | -46.12 % change on previous year | -27.41 % change on previous year | 18.71 % change on previous year | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, Czechia or Oman?
- Czechia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Oman as of 2014.
- What is the difference in people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities between Czechia and Oman?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Oman?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Czechia and Oman rank globally for people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities?
- Czechia ranks 141st and Oman ranks 141st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in People in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.