Seychelles vs South Africa: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Seychelles
94.4%
in 2019
South Africa
95.7%
in 2019
Seychelles rank
48th
South Africa rank
45th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Seychelles
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 95.7% against 94.4% in Seychelles, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Africa ahead.
Seychelles ranks 48th and South Africa ranks 45th of 191 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Seychelles | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.6% | 88.0% | 18.4% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 93.9% | 95.1% | 1.2% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Seychelles or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 95.7% against 94.4% in Seychelles as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Seychelles and South Africa?
- 1.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and South Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Seychelles and South Africa rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Seychelles ranks 48th and South Africa ranks 45th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.