Saudi Arabia vs Singapore: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Saudi Arabia
100.0%
in 2019
Singapore
100.0%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Singapore
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Singapore, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Saudi Arabia or Singapore?
- Saudi Arabia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Saudi Arabia and Singapore?
- 0.0%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Singapore?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Singapore rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.