Peru vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Peru
84.8%
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
84.6%
in 2019
Peru rank
94th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
96th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Peru
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Peru currently reports 84.8% against 84.6% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 94th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 96th of 191 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.1% | 74.8% | 7.2% | Peru |
| 2010s | 84.6% | 82.1% | 2.5% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Peru or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Peru, at 84.8% against 84.6% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Peru and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.2%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Peru and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Peru ranks 94th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 96th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.