Montenegro vs Saudi Arabia: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Montenegro
100.0%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
100.0%
in 2019
Montenegro rank
1st
Saudi Arabia rank
1st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Montenegro
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 1st and Saudi Arabia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.0% | 100.0% | 9.0% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 99.6% | 100.0% | 0.4% | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Montenegro or Saudi Arabia?
- Montenegro, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Montenegro and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.0%, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Saudi Arabia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Montenegro and Saudi Arabia rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Montenegro ranks 1st and Saudi Arabia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.