Mongolia vs United Arab Emirates: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Mongolia
100.0%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
100.0%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
1st
United Arab Emirates rank
1st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Mongolia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.0% | 100.0% | 14.0% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Mongolia or United Arab Emirates?
- Mongolia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Mongolia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and United Arab Emirates?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Mongolia ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.