Mongolia vs North Macedonia: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Mongolia
100.0%
in 2019
North Macedonia
100.0%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Mongolia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.0% | 100.0% | 14.0% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Mongolia or North Macedonia?
- Mongolia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 0.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and North Macedonia rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Mongolia ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.