Mauritania vs Tajikistan: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Mauritania
37.5%
in 2019
Tajikistan
37.1%
in 2019
Mauritania rank
178th
Tajikistan rank
179th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Mauritania
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 37.5% against 37.1% in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Mauritania ranks 178th and Tajikistan ranks 179th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.4% | 7.9% | 0.5% | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 43.8% | 17.7% | 26.1% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Mauritania or Tajikistan?
- Mauritania, at 37.5% against 37.1% in Tajikistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Mauritania and Tajikistan?
- 0.4%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mauritania and Tajikistan rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Mauritania ranks 178th and Tajikistan ranks 179th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.