Marshall Islands vs Tajikistan: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Marshall Islands
39.4%
in 2019
Tajikistan
37.1%
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
176th
Tajikistan rank
179th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 39.4% against 37.1% in Tajikistan, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 176th and Tajikistan ranks 179th of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.4% | 7.9% | 33.5% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 41.0% | 17.7% | 23.3% | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Marshall Islands or Tajikistan?
- Marshall Islands, at 39.4% against 37.1% in Tajikistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Marshall Islands and Tajikistan?
- 2.3%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Tajikistan rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 176th and Tajikistan ranks 179th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.