Marshall Islands vs Mauritania: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 39.4% against 37.5% in Mauritania, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 176th and Mauritania ranks 178th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.4% | 7.4% | 34.0% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 41.0% | 43.8% | 2.8% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Marshall Islands or Mauritania?
- Marshall Islands, at 39.4% against 37.5% in Mauritania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Marshall Islands and Mauritania?
- 1.9%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Mauritania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Mauritania rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 176th and Mauritania ranks 178th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.