Maldives vs United Kingdom: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Maldives
94.3%
in 2019
United Kingdom
93.8%
in 2019
Maldives rank
49th
United Kingdom rank
50th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Maldives
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 94.3% against 93.8% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 49th and United Kingdom ranks 50th of 191 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 88.1% | 11.9% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 96.0% | 90.4% | 5.6% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Maldives or United Kingdom?
- Maldives, at 94.3% against 93.8% in United Kingdom as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Maldives and United Kingdom?
- 0.5%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and United Kingdom?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and United Kingdom rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Maldives ranks 49th and United Kingdom ranks 50th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.