Malaysia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Malaysia
82.2%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
79.5%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
108th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
111th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 82.2% against 79.5% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 2.7%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 108th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 111th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.2% | 84.4% | 2.8% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 83.4% | 88.7% | 5.3% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Malaysia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Malaysia, at 82.2% against 79.5% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 2.7%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 108th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 111th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.