Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Mauritius: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
100.0%
in 2019
Mauritius
100.0%
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Mauritius
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mauritius ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.9% | 100.0% | 3.1% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.5% | 0.5% | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Mauritius?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 100.0% against 100.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Mauritius?
- 0.0%, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Mauritius?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Mauritius rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.