Kenya vs Papua New Guinea: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Kenya
84.3%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
84.5%
in 2019
Kenya rank
99th
Papua New Guinea rank
97th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Kenya
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 84.5% against 84.3% in Kenya, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Kenya ranks 99th and Papua New Guinea ranks 97th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.0% | 77.9% | 11.8% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 79.8% | 80.4% | 0.6% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Kenya or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 84.5% against 84.3% in Kenya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Kenya and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.2%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and Papua New Guinea rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Kenya ranks 99th and Papua New Guinea ranks 97th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.