Kazakhstan vs Switzerland: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Kazakhstan
96.8%
in 2019
Switzerland
96.3%
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
41st
Switzerland rank
43rd
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- Switzerland
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 96.8% against 96.3% in Switzerland, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Switzerland ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 41st and Switzerland ranks 43rd of 191 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.3% | 97.2% | 19.9% | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 95.8% | 96.1% | 0.3% | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Kazakhstan or Switzerland?
- Kazakhstan, at 96.8% against 96.3% in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Kazakhstan and Switzerland?
- 0.5%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Switzerland?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Switzerland rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 41st and Switzerland ranks 43rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.