Iceland vs Solomon Islands: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Iceland
91.9%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
91.7%
in 2019
Iceland rank
60th
Solomon Islands rank
61st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Iceland
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 91.9% against 91.7% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Iceland ranks 60th and Solomon Islands ranks 61st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.6% | 100.0% | 0.4% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 94.4% | 94.2% | 0.3% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Iceland or Solomon Islands?
- Iceland, at 91.9% against 91.7% in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Iceland and Solomon Islands?
- 0.2%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Solomon Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Solomon Islands rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Iceland ranks 60th and Solomon Islands ranks 61st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.