Hong Kong vs Romania: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Hong Kong
100.0%
in 2019
Romania
100.0%
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
1st
Romania rank
1st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Romania
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Romania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 68.1% | 31.9% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 79.4% | 20.6% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Hong Kong or Romania?
- Hong Kong, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Hong Kong and Romania?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Romania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Romania rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.