Hong Kong, China vs Mongolia: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Hong Kong, China
100.0%
in 2019
Mongolia
100.0%
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Mongolia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 86.0% | 14.0% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Hong Kong, China or Mongolia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Hong Kong, China and Mongolia?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Mongolia rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.