Honduras vs Republic of Moldova: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Honduras
81.7%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
82.2%
in 2019
Honduras rank
109th
Republic of Moldova rank
107th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Honduras
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 82.2% against 81.7% in Honduras, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 109th and Republic of Moldova ranks 107th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.3% | 77.7% | 6.6% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 82.0% | 84.5% | 2.5% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Honduras or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 82.2% against 81.7% in Honduras as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Honduras and Republic of Moldova?
- 0.5%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Republic of Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Republic of Moldova rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Honduras ranks 109th and Republic of Moldova ranks 107th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.