Guyana vs United Kingdom: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Guyana
93.8%
in 2019
United Kingdom
93.8%
in 2019
Guyana rank
51st
United Kingdom rank
50th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Guyana
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 93.8% against 93.8% in Guyana, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Guyana ranks 51st and United Kingdom ranks 50th of 191 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.8% | 88.1% | 6.3% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 89.9% | 90.4% | 0.4% | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Guyana or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 93.8% against 93.8% in Guyana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Guyana and United Kingdom?
- 0.0%, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and United Kingdom?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guyana and United Kingdom rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Guyana ranks 51st and United Kingdom ranks 50th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.