Guinea vs Mauritania: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Guinea
33.4%
in 2019
Mauritania
37.5%
in 2019
Guinea rank
180th
Mauritania rank
178th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Guinea
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 37.5% against 33.4% in Guinea, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 180th and Mauritania ranks 178th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.1% | 7.4% | 21.7% | Guinea |
| 2010s | 33.9% | 43.8% | 9.9% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Guinea or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 37.5% against 33.4% in Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Guinea and Mauritania?
- 4.1%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Mauritania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guinea and Mauritania rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Guinea ranks 180th and Mauritania ranks 178th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.