Guinea-Bissau vs Ukraine: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
72.2%
in 2019
Ukraine
72.6%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
132nd
Ukraine rank
130th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 72.6% against 72.2% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 132nd and Ukraine ranks 130th of 191 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.0% | 54.2% | 14.8% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 72.0% | 64.5% | 7.5% | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 72.6% against 72.2% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Ukraine?
- 0.4%, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Ukraine?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Ukraine rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 132nd and Ukraine ranks 130th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.