Finland vs Sao Tome and Principe: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Finland
85.1%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
84.6%
in 2019
Finland rank
92nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
95th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Finland
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Finland currently reports 85.1% against 84.6% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 92nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 95th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.2% | 63.4% | 4.8% | Finland |
| 2010s | 81.9% | 83.8% | 1.9% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Finland or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Finland, at 85.1% against 84.6% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Finland and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.5%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Finland ranks 92nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.