Eswatini vs Mozambique: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Eswatini
86.4%
in 2019
Mozambique
86.0%
in 2019
Eswatini rank
84th
Mozambique rank
85th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Eswatini
- Mozambique
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 86.4% against 86.0% in Mozambique, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 84th and Mozambique ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.2% | 84.6% | 0.5% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 85.9% | 85.6% | 0.4% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Eswatini or Mozambique?
- Eswatini, at 86.4% against 86.0% in Mozambique as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Eswatini and Mozambique?
- 0.4%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mozambique?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Mozambique rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 84th and Mozambique ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.