Equatorial Guinea vs Palau: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
13.2%
in 2019
Palau
19.2%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
186th
Palau rank
185th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 19.2% against 13.2% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 6.0%.
That makes Palau's figure about 1.5 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 186th and Palau ranks 185th of 191 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.8% | 27.4% | 42.3% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 47.1% | 22.6% | 24.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Palau?
- Palau, at 19.2% against 13.2% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Palau?
- 6.0%, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Palau?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Palau rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 186th and Palau ranks 185th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.