El Salvador vs Mozambique: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
El Salvador
85.6%
in 2019
Mozambique
86.0%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
88th
Mozambique rank
85th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 86.0% against 85.6% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 88th and Mozambique ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.8% | 84.6% | 3.2% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 85.5% | 85.6% | 0.0% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, El Salvador or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 86.0% against 85.6% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between El Salvador and Mozambique?
- 0.4%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mozambique?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Mozambique rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 88th and Mozambique ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.