Djibouti vs Republic of Moldova: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Djibouti
83.3%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
82.2%
in 2019
Djibouti rank
104th
Republic of Moldova rank
107th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 83.3% against 82.2% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 104th and Republic of Moldova ranks 107th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.5% | 77.7% | 5.8% | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 83.4% | 84.5% | 1.1% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Djibouti or Republic of Moldova?
- Djibouti, at 83.3% against 82.2% in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Djibouti and Republic of Moldova?
- 1.1%, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Republic of Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Djibouti and Republic of Moldova rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 104th and Republic of Moldova ranks 107th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.