Colombia vs Mauritania: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Colombia
29.9%
in 2019
Mauritania
37.5%
in 2019
Colombia rank
181st
Mauritania rank
178th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Colombia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 37.5% against 29.9% in Colombia, a difference of 7.6%.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Colombia's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 181st and Mauritania ranks 178th of 191 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.7% | 7.4% | 5.7% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 20.1% | 43.8% | 23.7% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Colombia or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 37.5% against 29.9% in Colombia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Colombia and Mauritania?
- 7.6%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mauritania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Colombia and Mauritania rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Colombia ranks 181st and Mauritania ranks 178th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.