Chad vs Marshall Islands: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Chad
43.6%
in 2019
Marshall Islands
39.4%
in 2019
Chad rank
173rd
Marshall Islands rank
176th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Chad
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Chad currently reports 43.6% against 39.4% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 4.2%.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Marshall Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Chad ranks 173rd and Marshall Islands ranks 176th of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.6% | 41.4% | 14.8% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 35.2% | 41.0% | 5.8% | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Chad or Marshall Islands?
- Chad, at 43.6% against 39.4% in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Chad and Marshall Islands?
- 4.2%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Marshall Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Chad and Marshall Islands rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Chad ranks 173rd and Marshall Islands ranks 176th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.