Central African Republic vs Palau: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Palau
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 25.8% against 19.2% in Palau, a difference of 6.6%.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.3 times Palau's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 184th and Palau ranks 185th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.0% | 27.4% | 19.5% | Palau |
| 2010s | 27.6% | 22.6% | 5.0% | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Central African Republic or Palau?
- Central African Republic, at 25.8% against 19.2% in Palau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Central African Republic and Palau?
- 6.6%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Palau?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Palau rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 184th and Palau ranks 185th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.