Central African Republic vs Colombia: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Colombia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 29.9% against 25.8% in Central African Republic, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 184th and Colombia ranks 181st of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.0% | 1.7% | 6.3% | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 27.6% | 20.1% | 7.5% | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Central African Republic or Colombia?
- Colombia, at 29.9% against 25.8% in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Central African Republic and Colombia?
- 4.1%, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Colombia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Colombia rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 184th and Colombia ranks 181st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.