Burkina Faso vs Uruguay: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Burkina Faso
78.4%
in 2019
Uruguay
77.6%
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
116th
Uruguay rank
117th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Uruguay
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 78.4% against 77.6% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 116th and Uruguay ranks 117th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.9% | 48.5% | 22.4% | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 77.5% | 77.6% | 0.2% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Burkina Faso or Uruguay?
- Burkina Faso, at 78.4% against 77.6% in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Burkina Faso and Uruguay?
- 0.8%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Uruguay?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Uruguay rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 116th and Uruguay ranks 117th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.