Brunei Darussalam vs Mauritius: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
100.0%
in 2019
Mauritius
100.0%
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Mauritius
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mauritius ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.7% | 100.0% | 13.3% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.5% | 0.5% | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Mauritius?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Mauritius?
- 0.0%, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Mauritius?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Mauritius rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.