Brazil vs Marshall Islands: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Brazil
40.8%
in 2019
Marshall Islands
39.4%
in 2019
Brazil rank
175th
Marshall Islands rank
176th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Brazil
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 40.8% against 39.4% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Brazil ranks 175th and Marshall Islands ranks 176th of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.1% | 41.4% | 0.2% | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 40.9% | 41.0% | 0.1% | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Brazil or Marshall Islands?
- Brazil, at 40.8% against 39.4% in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Brazil and Marshall Islands?
- 1.4%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Marshall Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Marshall Islands rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Brazil ranks 175th and Marshall Islands ranks 176th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.