Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Denmark: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
100.0%
in 2019
Denmark
100.0%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Denmark rank
1st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Denmark
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Denmark, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Denmark ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Denmark in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.9% | 94.3% | 13.4% | Denmark |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.8% | 0.2% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Denmark?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Denmark?
- 0.0%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Denmark?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Denmark rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.