Azerbaijan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Azerbaijan
79.3%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
79.5%
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
112th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
111th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 79.5% against 79.3% in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 112th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 111th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.9% | 84.4% | 7.5% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 80.3% | 88.7% | 8.4% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Azerbaijan or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 79.5% against 79.3% in Azerbaijan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Azerbaijan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.2%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 112th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 111th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.