Azerbaijan vs Netherlands: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Azerbaijan
79.3%
in 2019
Netherlands
78.5%
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
112th
Netherlands rank
115th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Netherlands
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 79.3% against 78.5% in Netherlands, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 112th and Netherlands ranks 115th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.9% | 77.1% | 0.2% | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 80.3% | 80.2% | 0.2% | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Azerbaijan or Netherlands?
- Azerbaijan, at 79.3% against 78.5% in Netherlands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Azerbaijan and Netherlands?
- 0.8%, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Netherlands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Netherlands rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 112th and Netherlands ranks 115th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.