Armenia vs Brunei Darussalam: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Armenia
100.0%
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam
100.0%
in 2019
Armenia rank
1st
Brunei Darussalam rank
1st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Armenia
- Brunei Darussalam
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 1st and Brunei Darussalam ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Brunei Darussalam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.0% | 86.7% | 3.6% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 93.3% | 100.0% | 6.7% | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Armenia or Brunei Darussalam?
- Armenia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Armenia and Brunei Darussalam?
- 0.0%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brunei Darussalam?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Brunei Darussalam rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Armenia ranks 1st and Brunei Darussalam ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.