Antigua and Barbuda vs Tanzania: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
75.9%
in 2019
Tanzania
74.7%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
123rd
Tanzania rank
125th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Tanzania
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 75.9% against 74.7% in Tanzania, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 123rd and Tanzania ranks 125th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.6% | 74.3% | 3.7% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 77.8% | 74.0% | 3.8% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Tanzania?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 75.9% against 74.7% in Tanzania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Tanzania?
- 1.2%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Tanzania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Tanzania rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 123rd and Tanzania ranks 125th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.