Antigua and Barbuda vs Syria: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
75.9%
in 2019
Syria
76.4%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
123rd
Syria rank
121st
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 76.4% against 75.9% in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Syria ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 123rd and Syria ranks 121st of 191 countries.
Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.6% | 77.1% | 6.5% | Syria |
| 2010s | 77.8% | 78.0% | 0.2% | Syria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Syria?
- Syria, at 76.4% against 75.9% in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Syria?
- 0.5%, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Syria?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Syria rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 123rd and Syria ranks 121st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.