Antigua and Barbuda vs Haiti: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
75.9%
in 2019
Haiti
76.4%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
123rd
Haiti rank
122nd
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Haiti
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 76.4% against 75.9% in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Haiti ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 123rd and Haiti ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.6% | 79.6% | 9.0% | Haiti |
| 2010s | 77.8% | 78.7% | 0.9% | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Haiti?
- Haiti, at 76.4% against 75.9% in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Haiti?
- 0.5%, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Haiti?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Haiti rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 123rd and Haiti ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.