Afghanistan vs Venezuela: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Afghanistan
29.5%
in 2019
Venezuela
25.9%
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
182nd
Venezuela rank
183rd
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Venezuela
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 29.5% against 25.9% in Venezuela, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Venezuela's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 182nd and Venezuela ranks 183rd of 191 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.3% | 59.1% | 27.2% | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 67.4% | 40.8% | 26.6% | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Afghanistan or Venezuela?
- Afghanistan, at 29.5% against 25.9% in Venezuela as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Afghanistan and Venezuela?
- 3.6%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Venezuela?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Venezuela rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 182nd and Venezuela ranks 183rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.