Afghanistan vs Guinea: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Afghanistan
29.5%
in 2019
Guinea
33.4%
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
182nd
Guinea rank
180th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 33.4% against 29.5% in Afghanistan, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 182nd and Guinea ranks 180th of 191 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.3% | 29.1% | 57.2% | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 67.4% | 33.9% | 33.6% | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Afghanistan or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 33.4% against 29.5% in Afghanistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Afghanistan and Guinea?
- 3.9%, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Guinea rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 182nd and Guinea ranks 180th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.