Papua New Guinea vs Slovakia: Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours)
Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Slovakia
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5 DB17-20 methodology in Slovakia, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Slovakia ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 69th and Slovakia ranks 71st of 103 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours), Papua New Guinea or Slovakia?
- Papua New Guinea, at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5 DB17-20 methodology in Slovakia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours) between Papua New Guinea and Slovakia?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Slovakia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Slovakia rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 69th and Slovakia ranks 71st of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with VAT refund measures the time spent preparing and submitting the refund claim and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 50% or more of cases, a company that requests a VAT cash refund arising from a capital purchase would be selected for an additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.