Papua New Guinea vs Russian Federation: Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours)
Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 7.2 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1.7 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 69th and Russian Federation ranks 66th of 103 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours), Papua New Guinea or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 7.2 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours) between Papua New Guinea and Russian Federation?
- 1.7 DB17-20 methodology, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Russian Federation?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Russian Federation rank globally for paying taxes: time to comply with vat refund (hours)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 69th and Russian Federation ranks 66th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to comply with VAT refund (hours) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to comply with VAT refund measures the time spent preparing and submitting the refund claim and the time spent preparing information for the tax officers, if, in 50% or more of cases, a company that requests a VAT cash refund arising from a capital purchase would be selected for an additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.